Procedures and processes of accreditation for GP trainers: similarities and differences

Professor Johnny Lyon-Maris, Dr Samantha Scallan

Background
The GMC has recently completed a consultation on recognising and approving trainers which will shape the quality assurance structures for GP specialty training the future. A central issue for quality assurance procedures is the appointment, training and CPD of trainers. All deaneries have systems for recruiting and managing trainers, however anecdotal evidence suggests that these systems may differ substantially across localities.

Summary of work
The aim of this survey was to provide a resource setting out the current arrangements of the processes and procedures that are required to become a GP trainer across deaneries in the UK. This work is of relevance to those overseeing the management and development of GP trainers in the context of the new arrangements for recognising and approving trainers set out by the GMC.

A survey of all UK deaneries was carried out to identify the processes and procedures associated with the approval of GP clinical and educational supervisors and to document the current similarities and difference between deaneries. The results of the survey were placed in the context of recent literature.

Findings
This work has identified common and variable features of training and approving GP trainers across the UK. The range of practices indicates most variation in approaches to the ‘training the trainers’ accreditation for this role and managing CPD. Results showed notable variation in some areas as well as relatively recent developments becoming established practice, such as the requirement for a certificate of medical education. Overall, results indicate a time of transition and the potential for practice to be aligned across deaneries.